[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]

/townhall/ - Townhall

A place for civilized animals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Flags  
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

 No.16331[Reply]

File: 1753914548536.png (551.64 KB, 949x989, 949:989, Trumps.png) ImgOps Google

Should members of the Trump family rule over the United States over the rest of this century?

Is this inevitable? Does this have to happen?
1 post and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16341

I'm gonna give a point to Trump here for the clickbaity ragefuel title.

There's nothing wrong with Eric Trump running for president and being elected.

It would be a big issue if Donald sets up the framework such that Eric inherits the Presidential role by default.

 No.16342

File: 1753962951778.jpg (6.83 KB, 199x253, 199:253, nodifferent.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>16331
Ah, I see. So this was their strategy all along -- get people to want a 3rd trump term and then endorse a family member when it's not possible -- how is trump different from other politicians, again?

 No.16349

I think we should give the united states back to the house of windsor


 No.16311[Reply]

I honestly find this worldview kinda juvenile.

 No.16313

Well it's childish to unquestioningly support authority. It's not like maga was ever interested in growing a conscience or do anything that doesn't spite what they think 'the left' is.


 No.16222[Reply]

File: 1752065608524.jpg (85.4 KB, 903x767, 903:767, mfw.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Are we currently witnessing one of the biggest and most blatant and obvious government coverups of all time?
23 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16301

What's the thought on Trump pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell?

 No.16303

>>16301
Least suprising thing

 No.16305

>>16301
I'm surprised that individual lawmakers haven't legally nullified everything against both Epstein and Maxwell.

Granted: this is something that truly nobody, neither MAGA nor liberals nor moderates nor literally any mass movement anyplace, wants. It would be as unsupported as the government banning ice cream cones. Or intentionally blowing up Mount Rushmore. Still, could happen.

I rate the odds of Trump pardoning everybody and screaming that Epstein was framed alongside that Maxwell was framed at a 75% likelihood.


 No.16283[Reply]

File: 1753185426134.jpg (4.87 MB, 1957x2498, 1957:2498, Postcard_of_the_lynched_Wi….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>15837
White people are so pathetically fragile and cannot even be bothered to engage with their own racial history, and this thread is plenty evidence of that fact. It says a lot when calling that out is seen just as racist as lynching a black man for no reason, hanging him, burning the body, calling it a barbecue, and then sending a postcard to another family member about said 'barbecue'

If this upsets you, you're pathetic. I'm not arguing about it, I'm calling you out.

 No.16284

>>16283
>I'm not arguing about it, I'm calling you out.

Then the thread doesn't belong here.


 No.16187[Reply]

File: 1750978516738.png (1.52 MB, 1936x1440, 121:90, trixie.png) ImgOps Google

Donald Trump owned casinos, which exploited people's gambling addictions, and he filed for bankruptcy six times in order to try to game the system. He is now considered by a subset of America to be the greatest President of the modern era because of these skills and capabilities. The Republican party either generally supports this or is merely using him as a means to advance their own agenda -- each possibility distasteful. Republicans promote opposite values in their campaigns.
12 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16200

>>16199
>An opportunist is someone who lacks moral and ethical concern
Which again, still leaves absolutely nothing for me to go off of in the original context.
He's an opportunist because... What? He just is?

>I mean I never heard Ramsey suggest to his callers that they should game the system, as Trump has done,
Assuming you are correct that he's "gamed" the system, is Donald Trump this Ramsey character?
From what you've described, seeing as you've labeled him an "opportunist" with an explicit moral derision, I would think it pretty irrelevant what he thinks.
Certainly he is not the entirety of Trump supporters either.

Why must Donald Trump, and anyone who supports him, abide by the divine will of Ramsey as though his word comes straight from the heavens themselves?
Seems rather absurd to me. Near as I can tell, there's nothing to justify such a thing, beyond perhaps a conflation of two individuals as the same because they're on the same 'side' politically, which even itself might be a stretch.

>The relevance is that Fundamentalist Christians say people should be moral, yet many appear unable to tell when their moral inclinations are being manipulated, don't care, or supports such manipulation.
Okay, but based on what?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.16204

My politics

 No.16273

Very funny how maga will always find an excuse for their dear leader. Could you at least try to hide your biases? it's so fucking obvious yall only give a shit when leaders fail when they're democrats.


 No.16227[Reply]

File: 1752205716010.jpg (7.06 KB, 211x239, 211:239, skep.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

One of the main reasons for appointing Kennedy as the Secretary of Health was so that he could launch mRNA vaccine studies to see if DNA fragments created in the production of mRNA vaccines integrate into human cells, potentially causing cancer. Yet, this hasn't been done yet despite all the other things that have been done already. It also seems like Republicans in general are now actively against mRNA vaccines, withdrawing research funding, including (apparently) not providing funds for research that would prove they are harmful.

I'm starting to think that Republicans never really cared about whether mRNA vaccines were safe to begin with and are simply against anything that is new.

Thoughts or any news that these studies are still going to be done? Or are they never going to be done because they know doing them would prove that they are safe?

 No.16228

File: 1752207493362.jpg (2.24 MB, 1200x1800, 2:3, Tumblr_l_452289526539182.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Of course, the freak out over mRNA vaccines wasn't sincere. It was all part of a grand conspiracy theory that absolved Trump of handling the pandemic with incompetence, and that federal employees were mandated to take it after Biden took office.

Never trust politician or media pundits to be sincere about anything. In fact never take at face value anything anyone says if they're asking you to help them gain power or a large amount of money.

 No.16230

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyge27y2g9o

From the news going around and the special cause for autism that is being researched, it seems like current MAHA is not friendly to vaccines full stop.

We're going find that effective vaccines are a myth of the past and that the only way to keep yourself safe from illnesses is by building a strong immune system by exercise and a diet of whatever supplements being peddled. Oh, and healthy genetics.
Otherwise,, if you die, you die.

 No.16271

if it took an obvious fraud to get you to think critically about this, you were always lost. give up and find something else to care about.


 No.16232[Reply]

File: 1752375370533.jpg (239.82 KB, 1364x1606, 62:73, FB_IMG_1752375311785.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Is superman woke or are you just the bad guy?
16 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16261

>>16258
>engages in complete psychological projection in a total "no, you're me and I'm you" fashion
>doesn't make any actual arguments
>raises no intellectual points
I didn't expect any different.

At any rate, living in a world in which all of the moderates, all of the centrists, all of the libertarians, all of the democratic socialists, all of the liberals, and everybody who's "not right-wing" (which is sort of like putting "not bald" or "not having blue eyes" into a gigantic bucket) are supposedly racist shitbags... if we take the MAGA claim that they're blessed, sainted angels while everybody else not in their tiny group is inferior bastards and suppose that MAGA is correct that they're a kind of tribalist master race better than everybody else... that would still not make it justified for people on the right to be racist back against anybody in revenge. Anyways. In the first place. Since that's not how morality works.

"Other people do immoral things, therefore I can too" is the mindset of a whiny toddler. To be honest.

 No.16264

File: 1752911352875.gif (199.52 KB, 220x162, 110:81, the-more-you-know.gif) ImgOps Google

>>16261
Closing your borders and kicking out the people who came illegally is not racism.

 No.16267

>>16261
>all of the moderates, all of the centrists, all of the libertarians, all of the democratic socialists, all of the liberals,
Nobody is saying that but you.
That is because it is incredibly retarded.

Stop licking lead paint off the walls, and try engaging with what we're actually saying instead.


 No.16202[Reply]

File: 1751160090944.jpg (295.5 KB, 1080x1637, 1080:1637, 20250625_211027.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

How could the Empire have been better off?
7 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16214

>>16210
Catgirls?
>use claws for advanced slashing as well as climbing, jumping up, and leaping down
>use ears for advanced hearing
>less need for eating and drinking to replenish their bodies, maybe
>less need for sleep, maybe
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...

 No.16223

File: 1752127567256.jpg (180.35 KB, 1157x1637, 1157:1637, tumblr_d293e790622b77f8699….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Overweight anime girls.

No, I will not elaborate.

 No.16225

File: 1752180955406.png (324.95 KB, 575x424, 575:424, Skeletor.png) ImgOps Google



 No.16211[Reply]

Why even bother if the government wants us all dead, zombies, or in a military cult?

https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/

of particular note ...work/education requirements have been enabled unless you can prove your mental illness to a government official, which is sadistic, and if you happen to get cancer without being on medicaid, if you don't somehow get a job or go to school immediately (they will only pay 30 days prior to coverage instead of 90 now, and you have to have worked 30 days prior to the application), you're not covered, which is also sadistic.

(also if a state that hasn't enrolled yet in medicaid expansion, the very good cost-sharing incentive is now gone, meaning they probably won't)

How is this supposed to motivate people to be proud of their country and participate in society, again?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16213

File: 1751633918387.jpg (107.14 KB, 770x974, 385:487, Colonel-Sanders-painting-b….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>16211
The American people are chickens. And they vote for Colonel Sanders. That's really all there is to it.

We want Social Security abolished. We want Medicare abolished. We want Medicaid abolished. We want minimum wage laws abolished. We want labor unions exterminated. We want more pollution. We want more inflation. We want lower wages. We want fewer options in terms of housing. It goes on and on. We want any restrictions on the power of government and business control over our lives ended.

We want this. And we're getting it. Good and hard. We're getting it.

Like the homosexuals, the feminists, the Jews, the transgender people, and the rest of Iran who marched in favor of the Islamic extremists taking over that country's government from the Shah and fervently wanting the Ayatollah-led revolution, with gay men kissing each other as they waved green flags covered with the Muslim crescent symbols, we really hate ourselves. Passionately. And we want an elite in power to show us "who's boss".

Like the Austrians, Czechs, Poles, and the rest who cheered on for the Nazis as they invaded. Like the Rwandan population that screamed in favor for the genocide. Like the Mongolians who would do anything for Genghis Khan.

We want a daddy. And Trump is our national daddy. Daddy. Not a President. Not a leader. Not anything else. Daddy. He's your daddy. He's my daddy. He's America's daddy.

 No.16215

File: 1751671195024.jpg (48.18 KB, 830x561, 830:561, IMG_20250703_190725_225.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google


 No.16221

File: 1751910158104.jpg (738.07 KB, 1080x1440, 3:4, Screenshot_20250707_103925….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Don't get fooled next year


 No.16181[Reply]

Non-MAGA evangelical takes down MAGA evangelical's bullshit dishonest representation of the Bible to justify ICE raids.

 No.16185

Slightly old, but a good breakdown of the role disgust plays in twisting Christianity for the sake of "Christian" nationalism.


 No.15704[Reply]

.
49 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16168

>>16159

This is the weakest criticism I've ever seen anywhere online. Utterly lacking in self awareness.

>>16162

>editorial content
>serious political philosophy
>pretending political cartoons aren't traditional

>>16164

>Fundamentally they only ever consider, let alone show, one side.

Editorial content has no obligation to be 'balanced'. It's literally a way of expressing an opinion, and if that's in reference to current events then of cpurse their going to reference the news their commenting on, of course their presenting their opinion alone. You consume other people's editorial content to get their opinions in response. Frankly this seems like a real stretch to try and play the victim over something that's been a well established practice in media for literally centuries. Editorial content is not reporting, is expressing opinions, thats what an editorial section of a newspaper fundamentally is, and the vast majority of content about politics posted on YouTube is editorial in nature, as well as the majority of content on cable news channels.

 No.16174

>>16168
Political cartoons are and have always been simple propaganda.
The default state for them is strawmanning the opposition.
You are right they have no obligation to be balanced; they are within their rights to be propaganda.
But acting as though it's consequently anything but propaganda is asinine at best.

 No.16180



 No.16098[Reply]

File: 1750612576293.png (3.28 MB, 1991x1111, 181:101, CRINK-Challenge-Image.png) ImgOps Google

America should be at war with the China-x-Iran-x-Russian-x-North-Korean alliance (which I've seen sometimes called the 'CRINK' alliance).

This is very obviously the right thing to do. This is a completely ethically justified conflict. These are thoroughly evil regimes that're absolute dictatorships that engage in not just brutal violence against innocents domestically on the basis of bloodthirsty ultranationalist authoritarianism, with ethnic, religious, and racial hatred being let loose, but also against innocents in other nations. They're supporting organized crime. They're supporting terrorism. They're fueling everything from homophobia to religious prejudice to transphobia and more. They're making the world a worse place.

I support Donald Trump's invasion of Iran. I totally do. This is likely the singular first time in my entire life that I've ever seen him say or do anything that's correct, with him being so predicably wrong for multiple decades now that you can almost metaphysically set your watch to him in opposition, but "better late than never".

As somebody who's voted against Trump multiple times over the past several years and am extremely glad since Hillary Clinton very obviously would've been a better President (this is an objective fact) and Joe Biden very obviously was a better President (this is an objective fact), I'm saying this without any regret, let alone any irony: Thank You President Trump.

Down with China. Down with Iran. Down with Russia. Down with North Korea.

And, well, up with Trump.

Who's with me? Who has courage? Who has intelligence? Who is willing to stand against fascism?
8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16152

File: 1750644400504.png (170.75 KB, 625x311, 625:311, troll.png) ImgOps Google


 No.16158

>>16147
Democrats and their liberal supporters have always been much more inclined towards wars than the left. OP is clearly not leftist.

 No.16166

File: 1750665937189.png (577.17 KB, 901x889, 901:889, 1732011064812.png) ImgOps Google

Feels good to get off your chest doesn't it? Seriously. Every single country you listed off as a government does not have the US' best interest in mind what so ever.

>>16117
Wanting to remain on 'peaceful terms with world powers while standing your ground are two things that aren't mutually exclusive.

The world powers are and have always been fake friends


 No.16068[Reply]

File: 1750492593759.png (450.23 KB, 1162x654, 581:327, republicanattacks.png) ImgOps Google

...looks like republicans have begun their attack on students. I had been holding out that they might actually help students, especially ones who do well in school by increasing federal student aid and tying it to grades (a sensible conservative position), but they did the opposite.

In short, house republicans wanted to cut the Pell grant for people paying by the credit-hour by increasing the course workload for full Pell grant eligibility from 12 to 15 credit hours, but the senate has rejected the change. They also wanted to reduce the aggregate student loan limit from $57,500 to $50,000 for undergraduates, despite it hasn't been increased in 20 years and there is such a thing as inflation, which devalues that amount.

If you want to get a Master's (becoming a standard requirement for jobs, nowadays), your aggregate loan limit will be drastically reduced from $147,500 to $100,000 (undergraduate loans included) -- so, really if you max out undergrad loans a decrease from $90,000 to $42,500. As Master's programs are more expensive and the Pell grant can't be applied to them, the cut will price people out of everything but the cheapest, lowest-quality, likely online-only schools.

In addition, loans will now be pro-rated, the same as Pell grants currently are, based on part or full-time enrollment. So, if I'm understanding it correctly, you will only get half of your needed living expenses if you only attend part-time -- making it harder to be a student.

Lastly, Grad PLUS loans will be eliminated, which were loans that you could apply for if you were pursuing a Master's degree and your credit wasn't too awful, to help finish paying for college if you max out your other loans.

People entering law school would still have a $200k aggregate student loan limit, so if you want to be a student as long as possible, that might be a path if you can find a cheap online law school.

That having been said, there are still some fairly-easy online-only schools one can find and attend. But as for ever attending a nice college to get your Master's if you're from a middle or working-class family -- don't see how it would be possible, anymore, with these changes.

I expect that Republicans will continue to attack the working, middle-class, and poor so long as they are in power. As the divide between rich and poor increases, and the middle class disappears, recommended financial strategies include either 1) become an enPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
20 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16146

>>16142
>with a high return on investment
Which hasn't been the case for years.
Yes. That was my point.

 No.16148

>>16146
There are plenty of studies which say that they still have a good return on investment, especially in STEM fields. In addition, just because the return on investment is declining slightly, it's no reason to pre-emptively punish students (who were promised the house, wife, pension and little american flag to wave at the barbecue if they did good in school) through legislation, unless perhaps you happen to be a billionaire who happens to have no further use for the remaining cultural capital of your society and is therefore more interested in turning everyone into worker drones to help protect their wealth than in improving society as a whole.

 No.16149

>>16148
Or I could look at this much as I did for Obamacare and notice how prices skyrocketed when the state started handing out credit with great terms.

That ending, I just can't really bring myself to care about.
And i don't really buy the claim that there's a good return in the modern context anyways.
Seems to me from most folk I've talked to, college degrees are for working fast food these days.


 No.15299[Reply]

File: 1746767313091.png (66.3 KB, 498x281, 498:281, kiff-disney-kiff.png) ImgOps Google

Now that the dust has settled, I'll just be the one to say it...

Trump isn't that bad
15 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16085

File: 1750572117408.jpg (216.99 KB, 2560x1920, 4:3, 71CFX8ZhTkL.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>15300
Europeans upset that we are no longer funding their handouts at American taxpayer expense? Oh no! So anyway...

 No.16097

File: 1750587396903.jpg (144.19 KB, 519x1148, 519:1148, 20250312_011538.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Glad to see our country going strong.

 No.16104

>>15299
I'm hoping to survive until he dies in office of natural causes, since that's literally the only way for him to not be in charge.


 No.16075[Reply]

Trump's ego could lead us world war 3.
4 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.16095

>>16092
Yes, I believe that's what Ron Paul was against -- and rightly so, as 1) there was no reason to attack and 2) you can't go to war without authorization by congress, which every president since WWII seems to always conveniently forget.

As far as helping Israel goes, the u.s.'s role should be de-escalating conflict and staying out of foreign wars, not picking sides and joining in.

 No.16096

>>16095
I agree. And we all know that war and "war" are basically the same thing and is a moot point.
Unfortunately Israel is an ally of the US. That means the US has obligations whether the people want it or not. Unlike for example Ukraine, which many people in the US wanted us to get directly involved in despite not being anything remotely close to allies. And while de-escalation would be ideal, getting dragged in is a very real and justifiable possibility, whether people want it or not. And that aspect is completely independent of Trump.

 No.16099

>>16075
No, World War Three as such has been going on for multiple years now, especially after the attempts at genocide in terms of wiping out the Israeli people as well as the attempts at genocide in terms of wiping out the Ukrainian people.

And there are the threatened calls for future genocides against the people of South Korea as well as the people of Taiwan, both of which have to get prevented from even being attempted in the first place.

Fighting back is completely morally correct. The Chinese government alongside the Iranian, North Korean, and Russian regimes can't be allowed to just gleefully slaughter innocents and try to impose a new 'iron curtain' of authoritarianism across Asia and Europe.


[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]