[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]

/townhall/ - Townhall

A place for civilized animals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Flags  
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

 No.13468[Reply]

File: 1716449653487.jpg (1.63 MB, 2000x1672, 250:209, YOO This dude giving me a ….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>Absolute monarchys and benevolent dictatorships are the best ways for a country to function

This is what I unironically believe and I won't elaborate
11 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13716

>>13703
>>13703
>To be fair, monarchies do seem to have a better track record of it than such things as we have now.

To be fair, they also had absolutely authority over the contents of official history books

 No.13717

>>13716
Only within their own sphere of influence, and really, it's not like there were proper history books for many, so much as collections of letters, dealings, reports, and so on later folk compile.

 No.13718

>>13717
>Only within their own sphere of influence

Uh huh. And where do the majority of historical of sources about a specific monarchy tend to come from?

>and really, it's not like there were proper history books for many, so much as collections of letters, dealings, reports, and so on later folk compile.

And how much of that is both available and sufficient to draw any conclusions, and how do you account for the biases of those later folk in selecting what to preserve and compile?


 No.13678[Reply]

File: 1719373636922.jpg (90.51 KB, 623x633, 623:633, Q_MBzibFrK95NA_bFGKFUB7pgW….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Is it me.. or are people low key racist here?

 No.13679

Maybe?
I've seen some pretty wild stuff here.
Though it depends a lot on what you call "racism".

 No.13680

>>13678
Depends what you mean by "racist".
If you mean "doesn't tow the far-left/SJW line on racial issues", then yes.
If you mean "supports racial discrimination", then mostly no.(Although some might support racial discrimination in university admissions.)

 No.13681

Pretty much.


 No.13601[Reply]

File: 1717531193617.png (145.4 KB, 676x600, 169:150, medium (1).png) ImgOps Google

Is English the greatest language in the omniverse, or is there value to spreking different languages?

Ist Eaglisch dijn masgrätan täl ent dijn omnimundo, oft ist dar stok ent sprek tälän altrá?
10 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13631

>>13604

yes, or wat about ancient greek?

>>13608
>>13609

...that sounds kind-of like normative cultural ethical relativisism-think to me

>>13601

eh, it's alright

 No.13633

File: 1718431332922.jpg (34.17 KB, 1000x1000, 1:1, Grimm.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>13631
>...that sounds kind-of like normative cultural ethical relativisism-think to me

It's just historical linguistics. Like how a lot of European nobility spoke French regardless of their holdings or how Italian is a homonculus a bunch of cities invented to pretend to be a country.

 No.13634

>>13631
When you think about it greek works well as a language of science because of it's highly synthetic nature.

Like. We call it a telephone, derived from Greek τῆλεφωνή. This is not the name of the device the ancient greeks used to call each other. Rather Greek words can be synthesized on the fly without an exact dictionary definition, so you can describe inventions that there is no name for succinctly without being cringe.


 No.13409[Reply]

File: 1715857040726.jpg (325.57 KB, 1200x768, 25:16, Untitled.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

So the American election is this year.

You got a Douche on one side a and Turd on the other.

But out of the two of them who do you honestly think is going to win?
32 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13500

>>13495
Pretty sure it's the far left chanting 'death to all jews' these days.
And they're not really all that big on Christianity.

 No.13501

>>13495
Conflating what groups like the NIFB say and painting every denomination found in the States as that is wrong.
I get you have religious trauma, but you need to stop this nonsense.

 No.13629

>>13436
>if I don't agree with you then this place is /pol/

You know for as much as people shit on /pol/, it's a wonder that those opinions seem to be sprouting up in places all over the internet outside of /pol/. It's almost like people are getting sick of radical leftist ideals


 No.13422[Reply]

File: 1716017984282.png (11.88 KB, 1131x724, 1131:724, e271028f4841337f6878bd04a1….png) ImgOps Google

Let's assume for the sake of argument that a "national divorce" is happening in the U.S. such that narrow racial and religious separation becomes a matter of ironclad law. You have to pick and choose which areas belong to Christians versus Jews, white people versus black people, Asian people versus Hispanic people, and so on.

How would you draw the map? What group gets what lands? And what motivates your lines?
17 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13572

>>13509
>reasons for the font choices and color choices
I'm not condemning you or anything. I just don't get it.

 No.13611

>>13467
>>13572

for fonts, i think i mostly just started with the first letter of the group i was representing, and there was usually a good font starting with that letter that appeared to represent that group.... which was interesting. colors i just picked whatever came to mind.... for locations, just whatever came to mind first, mostly.. fairtly arbitrary but perhaps with a grain of truth

 No.13620

File: 1717981622908.jpg (118.16 KB, 850x1332, 425:666, image0(52).jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

I just close my eyes and scribble all over for borders. Then I colour-code every piece of land in the most confusing way possible (white people are black, black people are green, Muslims are white, something like that) and painstakingly assign the land so that, at the bare minimum, 90% of any one group's land is composed of random exclaves that don't border each other all over the place.

I leave a note to cede the Virgin Islands to the Punic people and the mighty nation of Carthage. I deliberately don't say anything about Puerto Rico, Hawaii, Alaska or anything other than the mainland and the Virgin Islands.

Worst case scenario they get someone else to draw the map and I'm not responsible for any fuck-ups that ensue. Best case scenario they try to implement my deliberately stupid ideas and the whole idea collapses like a house of cards.


 No.13618[Reply]

I did one about spiders.

But how are you dealing with ants this year?

 No.13619



 No.13574[Reply]

File: 1717188259832.jpg (324.92 KB, 1080x2039, 1080:2039, Screenshot_20240531_153819….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Assume for the sake of argument that you don't have personal empathy and you don't have personal ethics besides pure utilitarianism, and so either the Chinese military or other agents working for the Chinese state killing huge numbers of innocent civilians while starting a new conflict doesn't inherently bother you at all.

Is there any rationalist, utilitarian argument to do anything to either prevent China from taking over other lands or from punishing the Chinese if they act?

What's in it for those r.e. rational self-interest? Is it nothing? Or maybe not? What's the argument for "don't murder people who're your neighbors" if you're a rationalist who doesn't consider your neighbors' worths to effect your own decision making? How can one argue with somebody like Scott Alexander from 'LessWrong' when he says that he just doesn't feel any empathy or anything else towards people that he doesnt personally know?
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13585

>>13582
Well, if you're a rationalist billionaire, say, you could choke an innocent victim to death with your bare hands and then pay the family something like $3 million in a way that makes that family better off in their view of their own circumstances (according to you). Hell, Elon Musk could recreationally nuke whole cities and then rebuild them in a way that long-run utility in those locations is higher. If he was a rationalist. He could do that. IT's all axiology without any higher morality involved.

Eh. The problem for me is I don't really have the ability to operate like a human being with no ethics and no empathy like a Scott Alexander since all kinds of moral things from national patriotism to altruism for one's neighbors to social trust to reverence for tradition and so on that rationalists don't have in their brains and souls I personally have. I still want to understand rationalists all the same though even if they're essentially an alien species from another solar system to me. Tech billionaire rationalists especially have a LOT of money and power currently so I kind of don't have a voice but to get them in some intiuitive way.

 No.13593

>>13585
>Well, if you're a rationalist billionaire, say, you could choke an innocent victim to death with your bare hands and then pay the family something like $3 million in a way that makes that family better off in their view of their own circumstances (according to you). Hell, Elon Musk could recreationally nuke whole cities and then rebuild them in a way that long-run utility in those locations is higher. If he was a rationalist. He could do that. IT's all axiology without any higher morality involved.
LOL WUT?!  Where are you getting that insanity from???

>>13585
>a human being with no ethics and no empathy like a Scott Alexander
Enough with that defamatory nonsense!

 No.13598

>How can one argue with somebody like Scott Alexander from 'LessWrong' when he says that he just doesn't feel any empathy or anything else towards people that he doesnt personally know?

I don't know who that is and I can't think of any reason to care about his opinion.


 No.13554[Reply]

File: 1717130119223.jpg (118.21 KB, 979x545, 979:545, Guilty.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

"A New York jury on Thursday found former President Donald Trump guilty of all 34 felony charges of falsifying business records related to a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels by his then-personal lawyer Michael Cohen before the 2016 election. Trump... [has become] the first U.S. president to be convicted of any crime. He faces three other pending criminal cases."

< https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/trump-trial-verdict-hush-money.html >

My personal reaction is to find this conclusion to be utterly and completely meaningless. Like past messianic claimants who've assembled a ironclad movement of acolytes that no brute force could ever stop such as the Prophet Mohammed, Genghis Khan, Julius Caesar, Attila the Hun, and so on, any social, legal, and/or economic action at this level to harm the holy Savior figure of Trump is inherently futile and weak. He cannot be resisted in such a fashion. It's like trying to tear down a stone monument by just hitting it with your hands and feet. You don't stop a Messiah who genuinely acts on behalf of God's will this way.

What do you think, personally? Does this actually mean a lot? Could it down the line? Should it?
24 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13594

File: 1717286402892.jpg (88.33 KB, 960x768, 5:4, i want to come inside rain….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>>13591
I don't. Israel is evil

 No.13595

>>13594
Do you pay taxes?

 No.13596

File: 1717287068731.gif (172.67 KB, 640x360, 16:9, puppet laugh.gif) ImgOps Google

>>13595
>Do you pay your taxes

>


 No.13384[Reply]

File: 1715601891784.png (169.55 KB, 575x444, 575:444, Smells-Like-AI-Generated-U….png) ImgOps Google

Have you ever tried to express what you think about modern politics in some kind of creative piece, no matter how silly, experimental, inconsistent, or whatever else you might've thought it seems in retrospect?

Like do you think you can represent your viewpoints in a concrete way? I guess we can try that here? Maybe?
35 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13540

File: 1717100777713.png (3.4 MB, 1335x1263, 445:421, zxczc.png) ImgOps Google

>>13538
Doesn't look like it.

 No.13541

>>13540
>>13538
Could be worth notifying this on /canterlot/

 No.13542

File: 1717102146350.png (3.4 MB, 1335x1263, 445:421, zxczc.png) ImgOps Google

>>13541
>>13538
Never-mind, refreshed the page, the quick reply box doesn't appear until you scroll down the thread.


 No.13475[Reply]

File: 1716502500982.jpg (264.41 KB, 1352x886, 676:443, 1-s2.0-S0924224418306058-f….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Should fraudulently adulterating food be punishable by death?
11 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13498

>>13497
Alright so, one we aren't the same person.
Two, I made no claims how a system should be structured or what I want.
Three, my point was your notion of capitalism, or I suppose "pure capitalism" in your words, being impossible or I guess now "a rough battle," nice motte and bailey btw, is a defeatist notion that only further entrench the current power structures.
Four, no where did I mention the use of violence or force. I am not naive enough to purport that violence is not often the only tool that people are left, or feel left with, in the face of our current structure. That said we have the tools and means to make meaningful change and to downplay the work of the people that are fighting for what I would assume is a would you want to live in is repugnant.
My issue with your statement is I've heard it a million times from people, but anyone that holds that notion is just some theory drunk regurgitation.

If you think all hope is lost you lack a spine. If you think things can't change you lack a spine. I hope you advocate for the change you want irl. I really do, because normally those that accept your proposition cloister themselves away and try and drag others into the bog you are in.

Final response to this as the thread is completely derailed.

 No.13504

>>13497
>Capitalists taking people's private properly for their own and otherwise using the authority of the state to crush rivals
Uh, no. Not at all. What?

Capitalism is an economic system of trade between individuals.
It's purely an economic system.
It can, and has, existed inside most any state. Hell, even communism, despite their claims, had capitalism running through. Some stuff was nationalized, but there were always private enterprises still trading some items.

State authority is not required for capitalism.

 No.13507

Fraud corrects for false demand created by marketing and hype in production chains that are strained by lopsided demand pressures. Producers cannot sustain producing *only* extra virgin top quality oil but that is the only thing that their customers are interested in, despite the fact that 99% of their consumers cannot tell the difference and they want it for applications where the "inferior" oil is in fact better suited and cheaper.

Fraud is so rampant because the vast majority of consumers care more about the label on the side of the bottle than the contents, as evidenced by the overwhelming lack of passion the topic incites.

Fraud is a market force, like any other, that corrects for disparities between real and apparent demand, as well as for excessive regulation.


 No.13458[Reply]

I believe that it's incredibly helpful when looking at violent conflict to just sit down and listen to what a given solider "on leave" claims, letting them advocate even if you don't necessarily agree with or even understand that person!

Does anybody else agree? If so, would they be willing to post here similar videos interviewing soldiers from China, France, Germany, Russia, or any counties known for big armies? I'm looking to learn! Please share even if you personally dislike the soldiers' opinions!

Any other media covering the question of "What is my life as a solider, really?" is welcome too!

 No.13464

>>13458
I would have exceptional doubt as to that individual's credibility.

As a general rule, soldiers aren't allowed to just speak willy nilly about a conflict, after all.
At bear minimum, they'd risk repercussions when they return to duty.
If not being branded a traitor and incarcerated, should their dialogue not reflect the state's position.

This type of thing reaks of propaganda, to me.


 No.13304[Reply]

File: 1714563627650.png (281.5 KB, 1079x1152, 1079:1152, Screenshot_20240501-073240.png) ImgOps Google

What will come of the pro-Hamas agitators who are unlawfully harassing and intimidating Jewish students?
https://twitter.com/wanyeburkett/status/1785470499734319129
39 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13371

idk. but "people are people," as it says in the song.

 No.13390

File: 1715622656081.png (801.83 KB, 1080x1045, 216:209, Screenshot_20240513-134548.png) ImgOps Google

Hmm, not sure what to make of this.  I guess both sides have some bad people.

 No.13454

File: 1716329785301.png (671.65 KB, 1080x1323, 40:49, Screenshot_20240521-181209.png) ImgOps Google



 No.13401[Reply]

File: 1715802972038.gif (3.9 MB, 320x512, 5:8, greekgrills(suggestivenoto….gif) ImgOps Google

Males with high compassion tend to have high intelligence. Females with high compassion tend to have low intelligence. Personally, I want a high compassion idiot girlfriend. Have you made this observation aswell? Do you speculate a reason for it?
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13412

File: 1715874972098.png (568.9 KB, 1080x1414, 540:707, Screenshot_20240428-190700.png) ImgOps Google

>>13401
>Females with high compassion tend to have low intelligence.
I'd say that high-IQ white women tend to have have *misplaced* compassion rather than *low* compassion.  This is because, in whites, high IQ is correlated with being politically left-leaning.  Leftist politicians in Germany go so far as to defend their own rapists (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3675154/Left-wing-German-politician-raped-migrants-admits-LIED-police-attackers-nationality-did-not-want-encourage-racism.html).  Meanwhile, AWFLs in the US clutch their pearls when people like Daniel Penny protect people from dangerous criminals.

 No.13417

>>13412
Yeah, but I'd say what you call "Misplaced compassion" is what I call virtue signalling or compulsion to submit. Compassion is when you act well to someone, due to the thought of their emotion. Conformity is when you act well to someone, due to the thought of what others will think.

 No.13421

If you've an extremely reduced amount of empathy compared to most men, as well as a far weaker sense of empathy compared to most men, then women will find this unattractive. Because it's inherently unattractive. If you're a gay or bi man looking for partners, then this problem would also exist.

I'm not sure how to explain to conservatives and libertarians that you should have a great deal of empathy and ethics inherently because your fellow citizens who live by you deserve the same rights as you, because this is more or less a psychological thing. A result of brain chemistry and other such things. If seeing your next door neighbor suffering or even dying in public doesn't trigger an emotional response because they're not a family member of yours or such, and strangers being strangers you simply don't care, then so be it. Just know that many people have different emotions.


 No.12483[Reply]

File: 1693696732533.png (942.63 KB, 1280x853, 1280:853, large.png) ImgOps Google

Racial equality is assertion that racial differences are cosmetic and not substantive in terms one's abilities, character, or rights.  Is this general idea good, bad, or offensive in your opinion?  Is there any reason to try to be racially egalitarian (or I suppose to try to be less if your opinion is that racial equality is unwise)?
21 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13368

Can you imagine banning someone over their opinion?

 No.13370

yeah, they are pretty much cosmetic. this was established long ago, and everyone should have learned about it in high school.

 No.13400

>>13367
Racism is healthy. Racism is natural. Racism is what separates man from plant. Has a plant ever called you a nigger? Exhibit A.


 No.13130[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

File: 1713307188519.jpg (117.69 KB, 720x950, 72:95, Olivia.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

So when is it gonna end?
86 posts and 23 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.13393

>>13391
You're underestimating how well GPT-4 works.  Yeah, it makes mistakes, but it is especially good at simple things like "How do people on the internet use the term 'social justice'?".

>>13392
Oh, you haven't heard of that before?  Here is a web page that goes into it:
https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/the-root-cause-the-insanity-college-campuses-older-you-may-think

 No.13394

>>13393
>it is especially good at simple things like "How do people on the internet use the term 'social justice'?".
It isn't actually good at that. It's good at making what sounds like a reasonable answer to the question.

LLMs aren't actually intelligent, no matter how sophisticated or advanced they are. Despite making a good answer, ChatGPT doesn't know what "justice" means conceptually in the same way a human would understand the term. ChatGPT just knows that words like "justice" is often used with words like "equality" and "fairness" but it doesn't actually know what those concepts mean. ChatGPT is really cool and fun, it just isn't a knowledge source.

 No.13395

>>13394
>It isn't actually good at that.
What failures have you seen on GPT-4 here?

>>13394
>LLMs aren't actually intelligent, no matter how sophisticated or advanced they are.
GPT-4 certainly isn't human-level AGI, but I'd say it certainly has intelligence to some degree.  

>>13394
>ChatGPT just knows that words like "justice" is often used with words like "equality" and "fairness" but it doesn't actually know what those concepts mean.
I disagree with that.  What's a prompt that demonstrates GPT-4 failing to understand what the concepts mean?


[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[ home ] [ pony / townhall / rp / canterlot / rules ] [ arch ]