The fundamental problem at play gage is, most everyone on the right can easily see themselves in the shoes of Charlie Kirk.
Because those of us are capable of listening to what he actually says, and contrasting that with the narrative the left pushes.
More than that; We've experienced it, personally.
We've had discussions, arguments, disagreement, and so on with the same sorts of people like Cardinal here.
We know that claim about "hateful rhetoric" is something they'll throw around to anyone.
We've experienced it ourselves.
So when you have someone like Kirk murdered, and you're told "Well yeah, it's his own fault for saying such hateful bigoted things!"... We all know that could so, so very easily, be used on us, too. Despite not being hateful, that's the claim that'll inevitably be made.
Not only made, but spread. Shared to others.
It's why I ask the question in the OP. Because despite my engaging in it, I wonder if there's any point in debating with Andrea here about this.
If I get shot in some alley by some crazy lefty who somehow managed to track me down, why wouldn't she say the exact same thing as she did about Kirk, and blame it all on me and my "hateful" rhetoric?
And if that's the standard... What's the point?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.