No.1195016
File: 1750869782436.jpg (85.55 KB, 1080x1350, 4:5, FB_IMG_1750638414125.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
hmmmm
No.1195017
File: 1750870184122.png (49.92 KB, 399x429, 133:143, What have I done.png) ImgOps Google
Oh my god, all the non-chatgpt users turned a sickly green color! We need to get everyone using chatgpt, stat!
No.1195019
File: 1750871535064.png (183.34 KB, 800x500, 8:5, glim36.png) ImgOps Google
No.1195024
File: 1750884726406.png (256.05 KB, 503x392, 503:392, A guy in shades.png) ImgOps Google
>>1195021Please do not post such lewd pornography on the board
No.1195026
File: 1750893761933.png (89.15 KB, 809x585, 809:585, bored.png) ImgOps Google
I realize a vibe check doesn't amount to much regarding studies (assuming this one is actually rigorous and not manipulated by the article author), but this doesn't pass the vibe check for me. It just sounds like sensationalist gibberish.
No.1195027
File: 1750894720845.png (137.45 KB, 947x761, 947:761, image-8.png) ImgOps Google
>posters taking this seriously
>not recognizing it's subtle trolling
No.1195031
File: 1750900127670.png (48.74 KB, 479x433, 479:433, Hehe.png) ImgOps Google
>>1195027I don't know if people on the internet are capable of recognizing subtle trolling.
>>1195026So there was an actual study, no idea if that's what this one is referring to. It measured people over three months of using LLMs for all your coursework, using Google, and using neither of those things. It concluded there was a significant downturn in the people using LLMs, which as mentioned before maybe isn't any surprise. But also I think the study totalled like 52 people?