File: 1496901249760.jpeg (787.35 KB, 1000x1390, 100:139, Megumin-Kono-Suba-3743812.jpeg) ImgOps Google
I was warned for >>>/pony/507860, and specifically Rules 6 and 11 were mentioned. Respectfully, I would like to note that my post clearly does not even come close to violating Rule 11; not a single word in my post is even arguably an offensive slur. 15 posts and 9 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
Rule 6 is: "Don't shitpost. We define shitpost as: threads that are purposely created to add nothing to the site, regurgitating spamlike content which is low in creativity, and with potential ill intentions that contribute negatively to the site."
Let me address each criterion.
"threads that are purposely created to add nothing to the site": The post was a reply, not a thread, and furthermore, at least IMHO, it was not completely devoid of humor value. I realize that the site staff might disagree and hold that the post had zero or negative value, but that is inherently a very subjective judgement and little guidance is available in regards to how the site staff measures the value of posts.
"regurgitating spamlike content which is low in creativity": I think it should be fairly clear from my recent post history that I haven't been spamming or regurgitating posts substantially similar to that post.
"with potential ill intentions that contribute negatively to the site": I don't know how you are trying to infer my intentions, but I can assure they that they weren't ill. It is apparent now that others didn't find my post as funny as I did, but that constitutes only a failure of judgement on my part, not ill intentions.
So, I would like to request additional guidance on what exactly the site staff finds objectionable about my post. I realize it's not one of the finest posts on the site, and likely it's even in the bottom 10% of posts, but I don't see how it is even skirting the lines of the rules.
File: 1499838839109.png (239.56 KB, 493x641, 493:641, 56546546546839904442227454….png) ImgOps Google
I find it kinda sad that that the hammer and sickle aren't universally understood to be condemned. I don't want to hear "that's not real communism, man".
I guess it's because because USSR was a """""ally""""" with us against the axis so they're seen as heros despite what they've done soon after leading us to the cold war.
You should know all about Mao's China, Moony.
Anyway, just trying to be fair and stressing this, and I wish more people would understand NatSoc and Communism were basically two-sides of the same coin.
Just something to think about.
File: 1499861456146.jpg (116.86 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Shinobu_Episode_6_Karen_Be….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
I'm pretty sure that Moony didn't say that he's going to outright ban all Nazi swastikas yet allow ad libitum
posting of the Communist hammer & sickle. He seemed to say that, when determining whether a given post is a shitpost, he's going to give heavy weight to the fact that many people online use Nazi iconography to shitpost and that there is comparatively little use of Nazi iconography for reasons that would comply with the rules of this site. But when a thread is clearly non-shitposting, I expect it would considered in compliance with the rules even if it incidentally contains a Nazi swastika. E.g., http://ponyville.us/pony/res/536445.html