I'm saying bitcoin is going to be better than the USD, by virtue of not being controlled by the state with a vested interest in simply printing money to pay for its debts.
I have no idea why currency would influence the environment at all, honestly.
I assumed it wasn't the literal 'environment', as in global warming and such, but rather the more conceptual 'environment' of economics or society perhaps.
I don't see why bitcoin would be worse than printed money, considering you have a tangible physical object that requires immense resources to produce and ship, compared to a string of code. Seems like bitcoin again wins out.