File: 1665805348607.png (245.84 KB, 1080x964, 270:241, snapshot_1649362471256_2.png) ImgOps Google
What do you think of this argument?
File: 1665835859835.jpg (9.95 KB, 480x360, 4:3, hqdefault.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
- I exploited children because it was profitable.
- I exploited children because I was evil.
- I molested children because I lacked sexual stimulation.
- I molested children because I was evil.
The first step seems to be to pick a model.
In general I can't come up with an answer I wish to defend.
>>11550> I molested children because I lacked sexual stimulation.
I hate how people go to this for any sort of sexual violence. "I couldn't help myself, my boy craved sex, so I took it."
I don't want to act like a saint when it comes to consuming pron. But I don't understand how people really can't go about their day while keeping it in their pants.
And that's why I also feel that pedophiles shouldn't even be seeking an outlet by watching CP.
Just get better at controlling yourself and either do normal porn or find a way to get by without stimulating yourself.
>>11551>I hate how people go to this for any sort of sexual violence.
I suppose for me, I'm triggered by inconsistency.>Just get better at controlling yourself and either do normal porn or find a way to get by without stimulating yourself.
I feel like if you say "Pedophiles are EVIL. Full stop," all is well. If someone continues, saying pedophiles might be converted or that they can be abstinent, you end up applying models that many think are inappropriate for [other] sexualities. You really have to just go back to -- it's evil, there's no reasoning with it.
I will say there's a lot of naivety involved in regards to why someone would pay for something they know is real, or something they know suffered.
But outside of that, the industry wouldn't have, let's say, outsiders if this was how it was done.
This said, though, I'm not sure how much of the lot is outsiders to begin with.