File: 1540404898832.jpg (121.52 KB, 800x700, 8:7, 80a796e95bdabea6b78bb4ef0a….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
You got more to say on this topic? Say it here!
File: 1540408222585.png (87.14 KB, 352x298, 176:149, 4.PNG) ImgOps Google
I'd still like to see a toggle-able option, for the switch. Doesn't matter as much, at least if LP's right on the whole no real enforcement for non-tagged items. But, it'd still be a nice convenience to have, and one that had been mentioned before a few times in the original discussion of the lot.
File: 1540418593344.jpg (125.13 KB, 1280x1761, 1280:1761, pinkypoleinnocent.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
1) it's "lp" not LP, fyi.
2) the rule that was voted in is to delete the image with emphasis on most lenient. There was an alternative option to delete the image and warn the poster, labeled "strict", that was not voted in. Therefore I believe other than any hurt feelings over the image being deleted, you would only be punished for posting if it was clear you had posted something offensive on purpose or repeatedly etc.
3) let's argue.
I think a majority of your pictures are clearly SJW, so wouldn't it be more convenient to have it default to that than to NSFW?>>1956>1) it's "lp" not LP, fyi.
Is it "Ip" or "lp"? :-)
My problem is, as said, I've not got the ability to tell between the two. The line is not clear enough for me.
So, I'd rather avoid images being deleted, which is a much worse result is vs simply not having prudes see my sfw images.
File: 1540430584752.png (3.01 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, cgadine.png) ImgOps Google
Fair enough, then. I guess it doesn't much matter after all.
File: 1540454567602.jpeg (10.43 KB, 225x225, 1:1, images (16).jpeg) ImgOps Google
as long as you call a lost pony for dinner...>>1961
But which is SJW?
File: 1540515595279.jpg (3.09 MB, 3000x1688, 375:211, adineshower.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
A better example of one I wouldn't be sure about is more something like this
File: 1540516878644.jpg (5.82 MB, 2500x1688, 625:422, annarom.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
My problem is the original photo that's got me in trouble was also one I personally considered rather tame, not too dissimilar from this one of Anna, for example.
But, since they say it's just going to be changed to NSFW if there is a problem, it's not much to worry about. All flight what I think could be, and just post as normal otherwise.
File: 1540746252341.jpg (112.76 KB, 450x360, 5:4, 1463000616054.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
Feature request: Please add an indication of whether an image has been marked as NSFW.