[ home ] [ pony / rp / canterlot ] [ arch ]

/pony/ - Pony

Ponies and General Posting
Password (For file deletion.)

[Return][Go to bottom]

 No.747479[Last 50 Posts]

File: 1526438068130.jpg (77.98 KB, 1278x1280, 639:640, tumblr_p8bryaIlvb1rl04amo3….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

There's something weird about this Sylveon, but I can't quite put my finger on it...


File: 1526439456912.gif (1023.64 KB, 225x275, 9:11, 1526273103277.gif) ImgOps Google

Don't trust that pokemon!


Sylveons can be trusted, though!


File: 1526443240049.jpg (20.2 KB, 440x474, 220:237, Money Money Money Money Mo….JPG) ImgOps Exif Google

I don't know what you mean.  It looks like a perfectly normal Sylveon to me.


I dunno... Something seems off...


File: 1526443871354.jpg (78.8 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, 353.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

What happened to its nose?


File: 1526443938725.png (178.32 KB, 582x752, 291:376, 411477543.png) ImgOps Google

Sylveon don't have a nose. They have a snout.


File: 1526444599389.png (9.7 KB, 210x220, 21:22, snout-def.png) ImgOps Google


So where did it go, I wonder?


I forgot there was a pedantic anon who quotes the dictionary around here. I was happier then.


Could be a birth defect. Or maybe it's shiny.


File: 1526450766980.png (95.81 KB, 339x338, 339:338, !!!.png) ImgOps Google

I think it's retarded


Hey! it's "mentally challenged!"


That's not a Sylveon! :fluf5:

It's a Pikachu dressed up as a Sylveon! :fluf4:


File: 1526451494664.jpg (148.07 KB, 800x720, 10:9, 1433460616758.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Hmm, maybe you're right. Why would a pikachu dress up like a Sylveon?


Why wouldn't it?
Why don't all the Pikachus? :fluf2:


File: 1526451857292.jpg (30.61 KB, 500x357, 500:357, 61a05ccb450ad3eae77f11c585….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Pikachus are cute enough on their own!


I can imagine basically everything challenges that mentally.


Don't be rude to the mentally impaired!


I laughed.

I'm sorry.


File: 1526461669288.jpg (37.72 KB, 600x511, 600:511, Evilkingganon used roll pi….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google


But if it's really bugging you, hide it.


File: 1526467447379.png (784.89 KB, 1200x675, 16:9, inkaypika.png) ImgOps Google

That's right! It was me the whole time!


It wzs me who brought that up tho.


...they were talking about the weird looking slyveon...


File: 1526489962735.jpg (58.96 KB, 688x584, 86:73, is your dairy.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Is just a Mimikyu using a Slyveon disguise.

Is not that hard to identify unless you didn't play Pokemon Sun/Moon.


File: 1526490563085.png (205.24 KB, 540x446, 270:223, thinking.png) ImgOps Google



I always figured they might make new Mimikkyu disguises. But this is the first official release of something like that.  There's also an Eevee one.

Personally I think it looks like too good of a disguise. It needs to look more like it was made from something a Pokemon could find lying around.


"Its actual appearance is unknown. A scholar who saw what was under its rag was overwhelmed by terror and died from the shock."

"A gust of wind revealed what hides under this Pokémon's rag to a passing Trainer, who went home and died painfully that very night."

Mimikyu is literally so ugly by seeing its true form can kill you!  Why would anyone keep one of these around? It's going to take is one windy day for you to be dead!


File: 1526493213924.jpg (86.78 KB, 750x530, 75:53, cafeteria.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Ah Merchandise.

Pokemon Plushies

I see

In the anime
The only thing I know is Jessie has a Mimikyu.
So maybe they will show Mimikyu's appearance in somepoint I guess


Or maybe it will kill her worthless ass.


File: 1526495326500.jpg (84.17 KB, 500x334, 250:167, 2056641388_5a0bf0de2d_z.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Ouch! Cold hearted!



Maybe Mimikyu is the pokemons version of the reaper.

Poor thing.


File: 1526495456161.png (230.37 KB, 376x400, 47:50, fun times inbound.png) ImgOps Google

Has Team Rocket ever done anything useful since I stopped watching the show in season 2?


File: 1526495805280.gif (420.35 KB, 616x338, 308:169, stuff.gif) ImgOps Google

I Dunno.

I don't watch the anime since Black and White.
When I got tired of Ash being an useless loser trainer piece of shit


Not once.

I really dislike the fact that Team Rocket is still on the show. The organization "Team Rocket" have not been the bad guys of Pokemon for over 20 years. But those three characters collectively called Team Rocket are still on the show and it's blatantly only because of maintaining status quo even when it's detrimental to the stories that could be told using the other villainous teams that have been introduced since. Not only that,  they are never a credible threat and they never contribute to the story. They literally only show up to waste a few minutes of screen time in every episode because they "have" to be there, because it was the formula set up in the first couple seasons of the show. Despite the fact that when Ash was in the Kanto region it made more sense for him to be pestered by agents of Team Rocket and make zero sense now. In short I hate them.


File: 1526497688633.png (45.02 KB, 616x374, 28:17, That might just be releven….png) ImgOps Google

They should just make the show about Team Rocket.


File: 1526497915321.png (220.77 KB, 446x454, 223:227, oh right 2.png) ImgOps Google

As long as they finally get shipped and we get an episode where Meowth walks in on them and is totally traumatized thereafter


I'll cut you.

Considering he wants wore a fake  bikini with inflatable boobs, James is more than likely gay.


File: 1526499608356.png (90.93 KB, 327x317, 327:317, eeheehee.png) ImgOps Google

Is Jessie?


I don't know, maybe?


To be fair, they try to do different things with them here and there. In Black and White they got orders to stop chasing that kid around and start doing actual criminal work for the boss again in order to investigate team plasma's goals, and they were hilariously competent at it! Breathed some new life into them, so to speak.

In the latest season, they legitimately beat Ash in a battle. Also they got a Z-move.


File: 1526509644884.jpg (134.22 KB, 358x500, 179:250, eb6fb24b0bf6bf9ff080064cb0….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

If it was about how Giovanni grew up, then yeah totally.


It was actually very wholesome. Turns out he's just like that.


I dislike the Pokemon anime overall for the same reasons i just described disliking team rocket. So its not just them sucking, its a symptom of a larger problem.


File: 1526517252124.png (835.57 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, Suri_'Actually...'_S4E08.png) ImgOps Google

yeah they did, i think it was around season 5 or 4.

anyway throughout the season they stop chasing pikacu to do other mission and funny enough they were successive on all there missions.
They were actually professional.


All the more reason they should give up on trying to steal Pikachu and leave the show.

The only reason they tried to steal Pikachu is because he's supposedly really strong. But since Ash has never won a league tournament once I doubt that's actually true


File: 1526517659687.png (18.46 KB, 104x186, 52:93, rk1.png) ImgOps Google

Blame the incompetent slakjawed immortal dumbass that is Ash, not his Pokemon.


File: 1526521074623.jpg (11.51 KB, 292x279, 292:279, pinkie it was under Eeee.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

I'd take it's a grudge they bear.

BUt they should have made that face turn somewhere I'd have hoped and just gotten on with their lives around season 3 or so.

Giovanni was pretty awesome though.


Giovanni's been done better in other places. Like the Pokemon Adventures manga. Or Pokemon Origins. It was actually give him a character. Even though it's kind of cliche he's conflicted about his choice to live a life of crime.


File: 1526537037831.png (248.71 KB, 1200x800, 3:2, 946ccad41d298974cdaa7fd586….png) ImgOps Google

Maybe it's the lack of a tail.


Who said you could post the femdom lizard?


File: 1526540332124.jpg (53.86 KB, 648x850, 324:425, ddfffc11fcd9d713134b8b6f2e….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

It's only femdom if you resist.


... no, its still female domination,  even if you're into it. Which I can neither confirm nor deny that I am.


"Domination" is more if you let her take the lead. You don't necessarily have to.


Okay considering this Pokemon uses pheromones and poison to control the minds of the male harems they keep, I don't think you really have a choice. It is literally a femdom Pokemon.


File: 1526545787218.png (2.74 MB, 1280x1280, 1:1, b341527e2dee3a88b1e364e73f….png) ImgOps Google

See, that's what I mean.
Only if you resist.


No, it's still being dominated, by a female, even if you're into it. It doesn't stop being that kink if it's consensual.


File: 1526581454037.webm (401.14 KB, 1526252877286.webm)

"And here we see pony posters argueing over femdom pokemon"


File: 1526584754375.jpg (711.11 KB, 1369x1884, 1369:1884, 8cad21b387978a8dde7c707852….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Well, what I mean is, you're only really dominated if you resist. She's not tying you up or anything. Just using gas-mind control jazz.


> you're only really dominated if you resist

And I'm saying that, no. That's not true. Whether it's consensual or not, that particular kink is still called "domination". And if a woman is the dominate one, it's called "femdom". ...come to think of it, what is the opposite called?

But beyond that, if she's using mind-control gas, then it's non-consensual anyway.


File: 1526587328067.png (2.51 MB, 2200x2785, 440:557, a6d7269cbcef30fb9253d5411d….png) ImgOps Google

Nah, see, it's just regular sex at that point, because there's no need for her to dominate you.
Unless you resist, anyway.


I think we are getting confused on what "dominate" means in this context.


File: 1526588279725.png (625.58 KB, 1400x1050, 4:3, 1af932c8d3b2ef46fa5ba22409….png) ImgOps Google

I take it to mean "exert power over another", more or less.
And so, if you're already doing what she wants, in this instance sex, there's no real reason she needs to dominate you.
Unless we assume she's got some other desires and motivations for said action, wherein it would be required.

Is why I said 'she's not tying you up".
Because that's a fairly obvious case of beyond standard actions.


unless you want to be dominated


File: 1526588546374.jpg (207.19 KB, 1280x1011, 1280:1011, 9ea1a7892290ed72357fab251d….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

True. Personally, I prefer a relatively equal relationship, ideally with someone confident and willing to take charge, but, not actually 'dominating' or otherwise placing herself above you. Rather, just knowing what she wants, and pushing you the way she needs to get there.


What you do in the bedroom doens't always have to apply to the relationship as a whole. Being dom and sub when it comes to sex doesn't always translate to your daily lives, although some people do live that way. I'm not sure it's all that healthy, though, but it's not my call.


File: 1526589076146.gif (5.06 MB, 994x746, 497:373, shake.gif) ImgOps Google

Well, all this applies to the bed, as well, though.
But you're probably right about a full dom/sub relationship being unhealthy.


You you want a curvy lizard pokemon to make you her full sub?


No way. I'm not into the idea of it seeping into daily life.


No? Not having to do anything or worry about anything? Letting her take care of everything while all you have to do is satisfy?


There's too much room for abuse, being dependent on another person. They say things like they don't have to respect you because you're dependent on them. That they don't need you, but you need them. It's not a good or healthy position to be in. Your kinks are one thing, but living that way? No, it's no way to live.


File: 1526592712531.jpg (149.98 KB, 640x1024, 5:8, DFeKqOWXkAE2WcA.jpg large.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

I do have a slight fantasy of a dragon basically taking you with the treatment of a beloved and perfect piece of her treasure, doing everything she can to care for you, keep you in pristine condition, cleaning, grooming, "polishing", and so on.


Sounds like more than a "slight fantasy".

What if you could trust them?


File: 1526594499126.png (337.65 KB, 1240x1748, 310:437, 5.png) ImgOps Google

What do you mean?
It's just one instance of "cute dragon doing cute things"


If you're in a relationship with them, then you should already. Especially if you're going to be doing any S&M stuff. Then trust is  the bedrock of that. But trust isnt infallible and can be broken. So you need to have a healthy life
and relationship outside of the bedroom. One where someone isnt too depended on the other.


A dragon would probably just eat you.


File: 1526606873126.jpg (154.63 KB, 1023x719, 1023:719, 2f5211deccebd275a925a4c4fd….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Possibly. You never know.


File: 1526610540502.png (299.91 KB, 800x568, 100:71, 09a.png) ImgOps Google

You clearly haven't watched Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid.                                                                                 


File: 1526610700095.jpg (73.73 KB, 750x475, 30:19, 6cd6b355c63d6dca4d0bf93212….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

To be fair, that was a dragon what got stabbed and then fixed up.


Those characters are barely dragons. They are also lesbians. How do we know they don't just eat any men they meet?


File: 1526614118405.png (1019.6 KB, 1374x682, 687:341, X82fD7h.png) ImgOps Google

>Those characters are barely dragons.
Tohru and Kanna are clearly dragons.  But Elma is more of a sea serpent.  And I dunno wtf Lucoa and Fafnir are supposed to be.

>They are also lesbians.
How can you say that an 8-year-old girl is a lesbian?  Do they even have sexuality at that age?

>How do we know they don't just eat any men they meet?
They didn't eat Takiya Makoto.


According to current science on the matter, a non-zero amount of people are born gay. Mean, yeah, it's possible she's a lesbian.


File: 1526614216206.jpg (247.81 KB, 600x990, 20:33, 8751286cb9a8e86355feeb2fdc….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Most dragons, at least DnD wise, can transform.
And the main dragon didn't eat that one guy when she was trying to scare him off of stealing her girl.


She did make a lot of questionable advances on that one chick, who very clearly lusts after the dragon tail.


>According to current science on the matter, a non-zero amount of people are born gay.
Please provide a citation that new-born infants experience sexual attraction.


They don't feel sexual attraction, but the genes for gayness are in them. That's what current science says anyway. It seems our confusion comes from the two of us using two different definitions for what constitutes being "gay".



I think that's actually what current science assumes, at least from the conversations I've had with others on the subject.
Near as I can tell, there's not evidence one way or the other, really.


If science proves this to be wrong at some point, then I will adjust my views on the subject. But as a rational person, I have to go with what the current consensus on the matter is. And it is currently that at the very least, a non-zero amount of gay people are born that way.


File: 1526619830268.png (240.81 KB, 500x614, 250:307, 1462036464026-2.png) ImgOps Google

I don't really think that's "rational", but, sure, whatever.
Kid-dragon is definitely gay, anyway.


it's not rational to listen to science's current consensus on matters, but change your views when and if that science changes? Sounds pretty rational to me.


It's not rational to listen to a consensus unproven or otherwise not properly explored.
It isn't rational to accept assumptions made by others purely because others make them.


>Kid-dragon is definitely gay, anyway.


But they AREN'T just assumptions. It is what science has currently decided is the likely answer based on the information they have and studies they have done. The Council Of Science(tm) didn't come out one day and declare that gays are born that way because we say so. They researched it, and came to the most likely conclusion. And if future scientific research or discovers changes that conclusion, they will change it.

It's dangerous to just say science is wrong because it's not infallible. That's how we get flat-earthers and climate change deniers.


I want to say Kanna.


I'm not convinced they've even researched it, as near as I can tell, the reasearch doesn't say one way or the other.
Frankly, it looks to me like the assumption was taken largely because of politics.

I'm not saying science is just wrong.
I'm saying assumptions made by science without evidence are as dismisable as any other assumption made by anyone else without evidence.


Unless you actually have studies showing this inconclusiveness, you are just speaking anecdotally. I provided one, in >>749326 and my link has links to the studies it used for the article.

You however have just said "I've heard the opposite, so I don't believe it." Which sounds more "rational" to you? It's a dangerous mindset to have, because again it leads to things like Flat-Earthers and Climate Change Deniers.

What does it matter to you if gay people are born gay or not? The outcome is the same. They are gay. How can you be of one mind about gender roles in the other thread, and the completely opposite mind here?


IT doesn't matter in the slightest, which is why I've posted >>749434
>but, sure, whatever.


I just don't see how following the scientific consensus is irrational just because you decided that it's an unfounded consensus based on nothing.


Well, I've decided that because I've seen that. Reading a few studies suggesting other items, as well as critiques for said studies, and of course my own personal experiences.
Not to mention reading on the subject in general.


That really sounds like confirmation bias to me. You look for things that support what you already think, so they stand out more to you. Whereas, I have no horse in the race. And honestly, some people being born gay makes the most sense anyway.


Problem is, I don't really have a leaning one way or the other.
Personal experience suggests it's probably a "choice" in the sense that it's from environmental factors, more than biological. But, ultimately, I don't really care which it is.


What "environmental factors" makes someone gay?


People they're with, things they hear, interests they develop especially through puberty, porn tastes, early experimentation, social groups and the ilk, role models, consumed media, and so on and so forth.


So you think that having certain friends can literally make you gay? You think that having certain interests can literally make you gay? You think that consuming certain media can literally make you gay?

Ok, that really sounds ridiculous. As for experimentation and porn, yeah, you're gonna be attracted to those things if you are already gay. But the idea that looking at gay porn can make you gay is absurd. There's nothing in the environment that can turn someone gay who wasn't already gay.

Let me ask you something. If these things can "turn" someone gay, then is the opposite true? Can you "turn" a gay person straight? Do you believe in conversion therapy?


File: 1526626776773.png (101.43 KB, 296x292, 74:73, 8.png) ImgOps Google

I think a lot of things act as influencing factors.
Much like most any other fetish, honestly. And, I realize it's more than a fetish, but, I think it's quite possible it's formed in a much more extreme way, yet similar to that.

Conversion therapy is dumb. You shouldn't force that kind of shit on people. But, it is possible, I guess, over an extreme period of time. I doubt it, myself, mostly because I think the bulk of the things what are likely to influence the lot are going to be around puberty. And, of course, you've already got a lot of experiences built.


I really don't think it's "possible" at all, and there's nothing supporting that. Like I said, there's more evidence supporting it being something you're born with than gay porn making you gay. But I feel like we are going in circles, now. If scientific evidence can't convince you, I doubt I can. I just wanted to make sure you didn't support conversion therapy.



consensus in the psychological community is that gay conversion therapy doesn't do anything to change orientation. Most forms of it are considered psychologically and emotionally damaging and thus is not in any way endorsed by the APA.


Yes, it's basically akin to torture. Which is why I asked him if he thought it worked. It doesn't.


also, if environmental factors play any role in sexual orientation, it's pretty much only in terms of how they might act as a catalyst to bring about a pre-existing biological potential to experience certain kinds of sexual attraction.


File: 1526628413663.jpg (23.38 KB, 567x625, 567:625, 1526184765337.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

a lost pony feels that this sylveon is an adorable plush and wants to take it home.

[Return] [Go to top]
[ home ] [ pony / rp / canterlot ] [ arch ]