File: 1523760736883.png (144.81 KB, 625x352, 625:352, billy-mitchell-bw-625x352.png) ImgOps Google
If you guys haven't been following the mile-a-minute roller coaster that is competitive world records high scores in old arcade games, let me tell you. It gets kick-you-in-the-dick cutthroat. Back in 2009 there was a documentary film released called "The King of Kong" about guy named Steve Weibe trying to get the world's high score at the Donkey Kong arcade game. In that movie Steve was competing with the reigning champion Billy Mitchel.
Well, it turns out the (self-proclaimed) "Gamer of the century" Billy Mitchel is actually the "Big fat fucking cheater of the century." Mitchel recently got caught using an emulator to get his high scores in DK and lying about it. Emulators are not allowed in world record high score competitions, to prevent people from using things like save states or modding the game. Not only this, its clear the recording of Mitchel getting his high score was spliced together from lots of separate recordings, which also isn't allowed. Because of this, Mitchel has had ALL his world records removed from the Twin Galaxies (the overseeing organization for all arcade game world records) and from the Guinness book of world records (who get their data from Twin Galaxies). Mitchel is also banned from ever competing for world records again. Having ALL of his records removed is a big deal in the community, because he held more than just the DK records. He was also was the first person to ever get a "perfect" score in Pac-Man; by eating every dot, fruit, ghost and not losing a single life on every level before 256 where the game crashes giving you the maximum possible points in the game. As well as several other records. Some of his records were probably legitimate, but getting caught cheating once calls all his accomplishments into question. But on the plus side, this means that Steve from "The King of Kong" is now officially the first person ever to get a million points legitimately in DK. In fact it was footage from the movie that helped expose Mitchel's cheating.
Let's celebrate douche bags getting their comeuppance. It happens so rarely these days, even in something as inconsequential as the world high scores we'll take the small victory.
File: 1523761524082.png (94.25 KB, 444x500, 111:125, 1435015737434.png) ImgOps Google
You'll get yours too!
File: 1523761672982.png (228.52 KB, 900x606, 150:101, pacman_pie_and_scaredy_gho….png) ImgOps Google
Seems a quality thread topic
I suck at those games.
File: 1523763461567.png (796.13 KB, 1600x1128, 200:141, 1cba91b6a689df37baefde0e47….png) ImgOps Google
Well... as much as him being a cheater sucks and he should be punished for that...
he really shouldn't have had all his records taken away. He should have been banned and had the record that he cheated on revoked, but that's it.
If he didn't cheat in any of the other ones, he shouldn't have lost the records.
File: 1523764103290.png (1.46 MB, 2593x3592, 2593:3592, 1216799.png) ImgOps Google
Uh. Good for Steve, I guess? I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be celebrating.
File: 1523764163225.jpg (181.15 KB, 1879x2484, 1879:2484, 6dcebc143e5da33ecf62e09f99….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
Well, then they should go in and investigate every single one of his records. If they stand up,let him keep them, if they don't, take them away.
You should never do a blanket removal like that. Just because someone cheated with one thing, doesn't mean they did with everything, and it should be taken on a case by case basis.
"Douche bags getting their comeuppance.">>725002
I think it's the right move to remove them all. Why should he be allowed to keep the others when he's shown himself to have no qualms about cheating? We have no guarantee he did not cheat every time and we can no longer trust his word.
File: 1523764562661.jpg (377.15 KB, 2000x2000, 1:1, 1f5202c01d53182b781b85f811….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
Because if he didn't cheat in them, he doesn't deserve to lose them. Only if he cheated to win should the records be removed. Just because you have cheated before to win one game doesn't mean you've needed to cheat in every game to win.
Just because you have no guarantee he didn't cheat every time, doesn't mean he did. Again, you have to go through and investigate every one of his records for cheating. If there is cheating, remove it. If there isn't, leave it. If he didn't cheat, he deserves the win, even if he cheated before in a different game.>>725006
Man, people who do online in DS3 after using cheats are the worst.
I use a trainer to play DS3 because I just want to get through it and do all the storylines and stuff, but I always keep Online connectivity turned off.>>725012
there is competitive aspects to it, yes. Not like Pac-Man or something like that, but it still has it in there.
It definitely can be. The depth of play and overall high challenge level can draw some pretty competitive people.>>725014
I can't say I've never used CE in ds3, but only ever for grind reduction. Theres definately a right and a wrong way.
File: 1523765074347.jpg (35.85 KB, 640x480, 4:3, snake-small-white-in-hand.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
>>725005>Why should he be allowed to keep the others when he's shown himself to have no qualms about cheating? We have no guarantee he did not cheat every time and we can no longer trust his word.
Well, shouldn't they at least attempt to investigate? If after investigation they have no confidence that any of his scores are genuine, that's one thing, but to just blanket-remove them seems quite cheap in a bad way.>>725016>I still feel like there should be a penalty for cheating beyond just losing your record for that one game.
But you shouldn't get to rewrite history just to punish someone. If you believe that one of his high scores is genuine, then you're lying if you say that someone else's lower score is the highest score.
It's not lying. It's just the highest confirmed
File: 1523767876026.jpg (220.52 KB, 1321x2166, 1321:2166, 1a0a712ca578c836b7d2b03c14….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
Again, like I said, being banned from all further competitions was something I agree with. That is your punishment.>>725023
I just use it straight up infinite HP and FP, leave Stamina, and try to play the game normally from there. Sometimes turn on Infinite Drop Chance for collecting armors.
Well, Peter Dinklage's character in Pixels IS based on Billy Mitchell. He's always been kind of a douche. Other things have mocked him before. A character based on him appeared on the Regular Show, and Mitchell tried to sue them over it. The case was thrown out. >>725060
But why should his old scores be allowed to stand if they can't be trusted?
File: 1523768379585.png (655.27 KB, 1876x1677, 1876:1677, 735271__safe_solo_equestri….png) ImgOps Google
I remember that episode. it's like one of five that I've actually seen
File: 1523768561627.png (346.79 KB, 700x555, 140:111, 51697fb0bb0436e89e867586c4….png) ImgOps Google
Because they potentially can be trusted. Again
, investigate all
the scores to see if they are real and that he didn't cheat. I've said this three times
I don't think you can
cheat a speedrun, as they've now become "who can break the game the most?"
File: 1523768822920.jpg (88.64 KB, 636x1259, 636:1259, 0525f2432a3ddc1ee1fc03dfdd….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
If they were really interested in justice instead of just wanton punishment to appease their constituents, they would go through the ones that he has records for.
If they can't be assed to do it, they shouldn't remove all his awards. It's laziness.
Gotta agree with you on this one, and this is how it's done.
Even police officers who are caught falsifying evidence just once end up with all the criminals they've put away getting out of prison because it puts everything they've ever done into question.
Being able to prove someone cheated is like getting caught shoplifting. You've probably gotten away with it many times before, but no one can prove it.
When records are made, they are based on clean proper accomplishment. It's a disservice to everyone else to let their other records stand.
Further, it's a disincentive. If you've earned a record, don't cheat to win another or you can lose what you've accomplished.
Like that bastard Lance Armstrong who i worshipped before he was not only caught cheating, but coercing his teammates to cheat too. Stripped of all his records, not just the ones he cheated on.
File: 1523769325895.png (745.49 KB, 852x1344, 71:112, 7a738da01f8a5ada02cb8ff8d4….png) ImgOps Google
>>725094>This guy has been toxic to the community for quite some time
Oh. I see. In that case, nevermind.
File: 1523769592940.jpg (353.66 KB, 708x1000, 177:250, 9c2d3fdf79e9661290765f6bd2….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
I've never watched any of those things, I don't keep track.
It makes sense they would want to get rid of him as quickly and completely as possible.
It's not like he was just some guy with a lot of records who happened to cheat on one, he's also a douchebag and sounds like a horrible human being, so I get it. It's more like they're punishing him for all his bad behavior at once under the guise of it just being that one thing that made it happen. I can understand that.
Wait, why would that be what changes your mind?
If you are adamant the burden is on the accusers to prove he's cheating shouldn't his being "toxic" be irrelevant?
Well that's because the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. And that's difficult to do if you need to rely on testimony from a crooked cop.
If someone is acquitted on one charge $A$ based on documents that he presents, but in a later trial on an unrelated charge $B$ he is found guilty of forging documents, the gov't can't go back and take away his acquittal on charge $A$.
File: 1523775966270.jpg (60.62 KB, 640x426, 320:213, mitchell-header-720x720.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
I recall he was a guest star on Regular Show on this subject, where he was also a huge jerkbag.
Is this old news?
His getting his records revoked happened a few days ago. But his being a jerkbag has been known for a while.
Did you know he tried to sue Regular Show for that episode? But the judge threw the case out.
File: 1523779969972.png (183.91 KB, 384x383, 384:383, interesting.png) ImgOps Google
Gosh, he really is a douchy type.
I'd be like super stoked to play a part in a cartoon show.
File: 1523786947364.png (62.65 KB, 343x326, 343:326, Now See Here.png) ImgOps Google
Heard about that, and good riddance. Cheating is about as low as you can go, especially in something like this.
File: 1523793477338.png (22.13 KB, 200x146, 100:73, fluttershy_green_saddle_by….png) ImgOps Google
I've watched some of these sorts of competitions. It's an interesting sport.
(Confess I find making machines that play video games more interesting.)http://donkeykongforum.com/index.php?topic=2055.0
That's kinda interesting. If I understand correctly, real hardware has separate circuits that read the video RAM for the TV signal presumably in sync with the TV scan. The emulator copies the whole chunk of RAM to screen at once every frame leading to slight differences in how things are drawn. Not that you couldn't emulate the TV sweep, but it's probably a level of purity most don't need (unless you want to hide that you have an emulator).>douche bags getting their comeuppance
Exactly. Lack of attention to detail when cheating is unforgivable.
File: 1523811256820.png (30.78 KB, 224x438, 112:219, Politely but Firmly Declin….png) ImgOps Google
Maybe this stuff should happen in an arena setting rather than the home. We don't record the times actual olympic competitors get in their pool at home.
It's because of how the world records submission is set up. Since it's on an actual arcade machine, you have to send in a video recording of your screen to get the world record.
It was only after someone meticulously went through Billy Mitchell's record (using footage from "The King of Kong" since those videos are not usually available to the public) that he found evidence he was using an emulator and splicing together footage.>>725198
May he be laughed at an booed whereever he goes. I wonder who has the official first "Perfect Pac-Man" now.
Yeah, that's how they found his cheating. Some quick over how the level is generated on original hardware versus MAME. Also, examination of the audio on his high score video showed evidence of the video being spliced together from multiple playthroughs, which isn't allowed. Gaps in the audio, sudden spikes in volume, things like that. Whoever discovered this must have spent a lot of time and effort just to make sure this guy got caught. I wonder if Billy Mitchell had sex with his mom or something.> Lack of attention to detail when cheating is unforgivable.
That's not the issue! The issue is that he cheated at all. Cheating makes it unfair to the people like Steve Weibe who are actually putting real effort into it.>>725224
Since the world records setters live all over the world, it would be hard to get them to come to one place to set the record. There's a lot of mitigating factors there.
File: 1523814651880.jpg (355.86 KB, 600x849, 200:283, 519864__safe_solo_flutters….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
>>725250>a lot of time and effort just to make sure this guy got caught
True, took familiarly with the approximations made in emulation and enough time to take the video frame by frame, and as you mention, paying careful attention to audio. Emulators are fun to think about.
The issue makes you wonder how you would verify someone is playing straight-through using a standard system at a remote location and not augmenting their play in any way. Nothing robust comes to mind short of setting up a testing stations watched for tampering.>The issue is that he cheated at all.
Maybe I confuse issue and cause. Those cheaters that mind the details are like the tree the falls in the forest and dosen't make a sound, although I guess the motivation to cheat involves a lack of desire to be fair and that's usually bad. So yes, bad stuff.
Cheaters are the worst.
On the other hoof, some believe in winning by any means necessary.
See Kobyashi Maru.
File: 1523833383987.jpg (377.15 KB, 2000x2000, 1:1, 1f5202c01d53182b781b85f811….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
It's also actually based on something that happened in Starfleet history, if you count the show Enterprise as canon.
File: 1523834052189.png (153.02 KB, 487x584, 487:584, A_confused.png) ImgOps Google
Didn't know that! I guess it makes sense. and if Voyager is still canon, then Enterprise is. It retconned a lot of stuff, though.
File: 1523834985902.jpg (3.56 MB, 2480x3400, 62:85, 2c4555b0108ac4559b5fe7b52d….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google
Yeah, there was a thing in Enterprise where they went in to try and save
the Kobiyashi Maru.
That's all I remember about it off the top of my head, though.
File: 1523836329777.png (630.49 KB, 3000x3000, 1:1, I don't get the appeal if ….png) ImgOps Google
It was a novel. It was a bad
I say that as something of an Enterprise apologist. They shoehorned in Section-31, a spy mission to Romulus
of all places, it's just a mess.
I'm sorry but if the Vulcans
got blindsided that the Romulans were the descendants of the Vulcans that rejected Surak, I doubt that some clandestine human organization could successfully infiltrate the empire,
much less the actual capital world.
I won't go on too much about that though. No one seems to be able to write for the Romulans correctly since DS9. Just don't get me started on how losing two planets, even important ones, wouldn't cause something as large as the Romulan Empire to collapse to the point Nero makes it out to have in the 2009 movie.
Yeah I didn't the Federation only learn that romulans look like Vulcans in the original series which is a hundred years after Enterprise.
Also the reason why Nero's motivations don't make any sense is because those movies suck.
Reading it again, that is what you said.
Oop. Federation hadn't heard from them since 80 years before having never seen them directly, of course if one imagines section 31 existing in the past what they know isn't shared back anyway. Enterprise kinda fell apart, cuda been great
File: 1523841622027.png (320.52 KB, 809x473, 809:473, rarity's_mirror_by_aisu_is….png) ImgOps Google
The Vulcans knew that there were some who left Vulcan and rejected Surak's teachings.
They did not know those Vulcans ended up becoming the Romulans.
File: 1523857417843.png (137.91 KB, 550x341, 50:31, Coffee brings thoughts of ….png) ImgOps Google
No. The first part is correct, but Spock's answer amounted to "We didn't know."
CONFESS, YOU FUCK.
File: 1523943515994.png (29.32 KB, 247x223, 247:223, Nervousness sets in.png) ImgOps Google
Just give him a second, maybe he'll...>>726579
...no nevermind, that sounded dumb.