[ home ] [ pony / rp / canterlot ] [ arch ]

/pony/ - Pony

Ponies and General Posting
Password (For file deletion.)

[Return][Go to bottom]

 No.561509[View All]

File: 1502310405939.jpeg (13.73 KB, 400x400, 1:1, lgJCmtjW_400x400.jpeg) ImgOps Google

You know what I don't understand? Why so many celebrities and politicians get caught sending unsolicited pictures of their junk ("dick pics" as the yunguns call it).

Like, who even does that? I understand the idea of sharing elicit photos with someone you like and who is interested, but to just send pictures of your dick to strangers who haven't asked and haven't shown an interest?
What is going through these people's minds when they think "I like this girl, but I don't know how to tell her that. I know, I'll send her a picture of my penis without asking. That'll do it!"

Has that ever worked for anyone? If it's worked for you, let me know. Because it just seems like such a weird thing to do.
222 posts and 125 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


>18 isn't an age I'll budge on either.
How did you arrive at the of 18? You said that you won't budge on it, so presumably you have some scientifically valid evidence to support your position? I mean, I think 14 or 15 would be a reasonable lower limit, but I'm open for reconsidering in light of actual evidence.


File: 1502494561833.png (388.19 KB, 856x989, 856:989, Do you mind.png) ImgOps Google

Because 18 is the point where puberty either already has, or is wrapping up. Some people finish earlier, some people finish later, but it's the point where the physical changes that were going to happen are done in almost everyone. There's some minor changes that happen past that point into the early twenties, but they're much less drastic than what happens during puberty.

Simply having reached puberty and being in the middle of it is not good enough.


File: 1502502894139.png (162.79 KB, 1100x1264, 275:316, 135286789703.png) ImgOps Google


Chalk me up for 14, I think, that seems pretty reasonable to me.  I could maybe be convinced all the way down to 12, but I think that's my lower limit, and it's pretty iffy to me.


File: 1502503522018.png (1.17 MB, 1512x2512, 189:314, applejack-military-2.png) ImgOps Google

Why not 17 then?  According to Wikipedia, "On average, girls begin puberty around ages 10–11 and end puberty around 15-17; boys begin around ages 11–12 and end around 16-17."  (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty)

Medline gives an even lower age: 14 for girls and 16 for boys. (https://medlineplus.gov/puberty.html)

Also, nice trips!


File: 1502504026164.png (113.97 KB, 321x321, 1:1, If that's a joke it's lost….png) ImgOps Google

Because I see no reason to try and give the age of consent rights to someone the instant that someone finishes puberty. 18 is plenty soon after the effects of puberty have likely run their course. Furthermore, 18 also typically the age someone finishes high school around, marking a social shift into adulthood. It's also the point where many other things become legal for people, so I see zero problem in keeping age of consent at that same age mark.


So you'd bang a 14 year old girl and not think that was weird?


File: 1502507731380.gif (1014.54 KB, 500x272, 125:68, eyebrow-pickles.gif) ImgOps Google

>to try and give the age of consent rights to someone
I think that's the wrong way to think about it.  If you're going to convict and imprison someone for rape, I think you should be damn sure that the alleged victim really didn't consent.  If you say something like "Well, the alleged victim likely was mature enough to consent, but we're going to throw you in jail for rape anyway because it's administratively easier that way", I mean that just seems a bit wrong to me.


Why do you want to bang teenage girls so much, dude?


File: 1502508639112.jpg (16.64 KB, 317x311, 317:311, lucky-star-in-front-of-com….jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

I don't.


You seem adamant to justify the act.


File: 1502510196039.png (336.73 KB, 1819x864, 1819:864, sexiest-pokemon.png) ImgOps Google

That doesn't mean that I personally want to do it.  Here's an example that might be easier for you to understand: I would adamantly defend the right of people to disrepectfully burn the American flag, even though I find such flag burning to be repulsive and offensive.


That's not a radiance, it's a Glaceon.

And why would you defend something you have in interest in doing?


File: 1502511606723.jpg (58.86 KB, 1024x576, 16:9, dc2-1024x576.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

We should all try to protect everyone's rights, not just our own.  If people only look out for themselves, the world would be a lot nastier place to live.  Does that make sense, Manley?

*hugs and kajis*

Note the tripcode.  >>563406


File: 1502511638662.jpg (149.17 KB, 1280x1200, 16:15, 137444453589.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google


Oh, it's weird.  Just not immoral or damaging.


Why arey ou pretending to be Star?


File: 1502513062297.jpg (11.52 KB, 188x268, 47:67, 1434885031548.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Because I rolled a 5.  Did you even look at the thread I that I linked?


I just looked at the post, not the whole thread.



File: 1502513525714.jpg (107.37 KB, 663x731, 39:43, glaceon-slurpee.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>That's not a radiance, it's a Glaceon.
Radiance sometimes avatars as a glaceon drinking a slurpee


I see. Well I don't know who Radiance is.


File: 1502514181627.jpg (41.89 KB, 600x450, 4:3, gl_n01_06.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Radiance is a well-known poster on efchan.  She also admins the /ef/ Discord server: https://discord.gg/0tbON7hNgjORWNLc


What's /ef/? Also, I see. Well, Glaceons ARE cute.


File: 1502514441575.jpg (58.79 KB, 760x642, 380:321, ef-get-11111.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>What's /ef/?



What he just described was /b/, a wretched hive of scum and villainy.


File: 1502515174388.png (96.71 KB, 421x423, 421:423, 101917.png) ImgOps Google

A difference is that /ef/ doesn't allow porn (unless behind NSFW spoiler), and doesn't allow loli porn at all, but does allow pony.  Also /ef/ is much slower than /b/.  Also Steam Twist managed to get himself banned from /ef/ for spamming and posting disgusting inflation porn.


Oh, good. I assume he went back to whatever cave he was living in?


File: 1502516494040.png (232.9 KB, 824x792, 103:99, luna-captains-log.png) ImgOps Google

He's shitting up /luna/ at the moment. He finally weighed himself though:
>Height: 66 inches
>Weight: 240 pounds
Even with very generous assumptions about his muscle mass, that puts him firmly in the "overweight" category, right on the edge of "obese": http://www.getchan.net/luna/res/101863.html#102047

Also he is still ranting about how the entire country of America is responsible for some random nutcase shooting up a place, and then he rages hard when it's pointed that he is an American himself.  http://www.getchan.net/luna/res/102154.html

Also he still puts sage in his """holy water""" and drinks it.


File: 1502517136831.png (449.05 KB, 416x990, 208:495, 1492690005347.png) ImgOps Google

Also, what do you think the age of consent should be?


We tried for months to get him to be less crazy, I'm not surprised he still is.

I don't think it should be lower than 16.



Holy crap, what a toxic dump of a mess he's making there. I'd ask why he's not banned there yet, but I guess that would just make him move somewhere else and it's nice that it's keeping him contained?


Since he's been banned, I'm pretty sure talking about him on here is not allowed. They got rid of him for a reason.


File: 1502553128628.jpg (249.33 KB, 1114x1469, 1114:1469, 1502515904513.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>I'm pretty sure talking about him on here is not allowed.
Then why are you talking about him on here? :^)

Anyhow, I just checked the rules, and it's not disallowed.                                                                       


He was a psycho and his insanity got him banned. End of discussion.


>He was a psycho and his insanity got him banned.
I can't think of anyone who would reasonably disagree with that.


File: 1502555683134.jpg (41.77 KB, 650x500, 13:10, 1490966274484.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

>I don't think it should be lower than 16.
But earlier in this thread, you were implying that a 15-year-old boy would be lucky to score with an adult woman (>>562891, >>562744, >>562668).  But now you're saying that it would be rape?


15 year olds do things they shouldn't all the time. I don't think people under 18 should smoke, but lots of teenagers do anyway.


File: 1502556405957.jpg (68.79 KB, 405x604, 405:604, Diana_Samoylova.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

But that's not the issue.  The issue is whether a 15-year-old has the capacity to consent to have sex.  If a 15-year-old boy has sex with an 16-year-old girl, do you think that the boy was automatically raped due to his age?


No, but that's why Romeo and Juliet laws exist. We were talking about an adult doing it.



File: 1502556753042.jpg (55.99 KB, 420x604, 105:151, dVehsiv.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

How does a 15-year-old have the capacity to consent to have sex with 16-year-old but not have the capacity to consent to have sex with a 21-year-old?  I don't see how that is possible.


Chrome already explained that to you days ago.

>>There's an inherent imbalance in power in that situation that is not appropriate in the slightest. Because that older person makes them feel special, or important, or "so mature for your age." It's manipulative, simple as that.

At this point you're intentionally being obtuse and making yourself look like a pedophile in the process.


>making yourself look like a pedophile in the process
How?  Pedophilia is specially sexual attraction to prepubescents, but we're talking about 15-year-olds.


File: 1502557682913.jpg (619.75 KB, 1768x2048, 221:256, katya-dea.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

Suppose a 15-year-old boy and a 16-year-old girl meet a party and decide to have sex with each other that night.  Not rape, right?  Now let's keep everything the same except replace the 16-year-old with a 21-year-old.  How does that make the 15-year-old lose his capacity to consent to have sex?  I don't see any imbalance of power in this situation.


Playing semantic games is part of you being obtuse on purpose.


Because its a strawman situation you created.


It's not a strawman at all.  There have been cases of 18-year-olds being convicted of statutory """rape""" for having sex with their 17-year-old girlfriends.


Which is why Romeo and Juliet laws were made. That problem has already been addressed. >>563791


File: 1502589093573.jpg (143.36 KB, 780x439, 780:439, ford-focus-780x439.jpg) ImgOps Exif Google

> Manley: Look at my new Ford F-150 pickup truck
< Me: That's a sedan, not a pickup truck!
> Manley: Stop playing semantic games!                                                                              


More like

Manley:"You wanna see my new car?"

Pedantanon: "Akshually, that's more of a van than a car. The definition of a van is…"

Manley: *punches him in the balls*

[Return] [Go to top]
[ home ] [ pony / rp / canterlot ] [ arch ]